What ELSE Might They Be Wrong About?

Oh, it’s time for some fun. When Obama endorsed marriage equality back in May, the National Organization had something to say about it. It’s time to glance back at those statements and see just how well NOM understands America. I’ve bolded some of the juiciest bits in case you’re short on time, but the full quotes are worth reading, especially if you’re feeling especially schadenfreudy.

Let’s start with this headline, glorious in its certainty:

SSM Will Cost Obama Re-election Bid

The Obama campaign is beholden to gay marriage financiers and is counting on an energized base to carry him to victory this November. But it’s an approach that is likely to backfire, alienating large parts of the constituency that carried him to victory in 2008…President Obama’s announcement is likely to spark a divisive battle over same-sex marriage in the Democratic Party platform this summer. Same-sex marriage will be a defining issue in swing states, especially states like Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Nevada where state marriage amendments are threatened by President Obama’s position.

NOM gave us this quote from their favorite political consultant, full of sagacity and wisdom:

Frank Schubert: Obama’s Gay Marriage Gambit A Pinball Loser

The left is jumping for joy at their accomplishment, forcing President Obama out of the closet on gay marriage. Their celebration will be short-lived, though, because they have very likely cost him the presidency.

The presidential election is not going to be decided in states like California where George Clunie and Nancy Pelosi are cheering President Obama’s gay marriage “evolution,” but based on how voters in a series of swing states cast their ballots – states like North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado and Nevada. President Obama and his buddies on the left have thrust the issue of same-sex marriage front and center in these swing states. How is that going to play? Not well for Obama.

Here’s NOM in all its foot-stamping determination:

NOM Promises Pro-Marriage Americans Will Defeat Obama This November For Abandoning Marriage

The definition of marriage was already headed for the ballot in four states this fall; now it will be one of the defining issues of the presidential election. No state in this country has ever voted for gay marriage. Just yesterday North Carolina voters sent a clear message that America wants to preserve marriage. We intend to win the marriage debate this November.

And you might say this one backfired on them:

Obama Abandons Marriage. Will America Stand For It? NOM Marriage News

Pres. Obama may be basking in the applause of the media, and rolling in cash from his gay millionaire bundlers, but American now has a clear choice: a president who supports gay marriage or one who stands with the majority of the American people.

How did that “clear choice” work out for you NOM?

That’s just a sampling. Browse their blog and you’ll find many more:

NOM’s Peters: Socially Conservative Democrats Will “Jump Ship” Over Obama’s Marriage Betrayal

Maggie Gallagher: Obama’s Gay Marriage Support Will Help Romney in 2012

NRO: Recent Polling Shows Romney Pulling Ahead Because of Marriage

This is sinfully delicious. NOM is currently in full damage control mode right, inventing reason after reason why they didn’t really lose on November 6. But no matter what they say now, they were simply, fully, and woefully wrong about Obama, marriage equality, and America. Instead of rationalizing away their disaster, they ought to be asking:

If we were so wrong about this, what else might we be wrong about?

But I suppose if they were that thoughtful and aware, they wouldn’t be in the business they’re in.

Share:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Reddit

6 comments to What ELSE Might They Be Wrong About?

  • 1
    Mrs. Chili says:

    I’m doing some in-depth research about DOMA and the place of LGBTQ issues in the campaigns, and I’m here to tell you that marriage almost NEVER came up.  There were stated position on each candidate’s website, but never ONCE did any queer concerns come up in debates, speeches, or press questions.

    Also?  I love the word “schadenfreudy.”
    Love ya!
    Chili

  • 2
    Chris M says:

    For the sake of time, lets ask what have they ever been right about…
     
    Anyone?
     
    Hello?
     
    Bueller?
     
    Bueller?

  • 3
    Allen says:

    I think I’ve just experienced a schadenfreudyan slip.

  • 4
    Spunky says:

    To be fair to NOM, Obama did lose North Carolina. If I had more time I would sift through all the comments in the NOM Blog to find all cases where someone ended his argument with “yeah well you’ll see when the voters cream you at the ballot box this November!”

  • 5
    Sam says:

    George “Clunie”?  These people really have their finger on the pulse of America, don’t they? 

  • 6
    Richard R says:

    “What ELSE Might They Be Wrong About?”
     
    The elephant in the room that everyone hesitates to mention directly is RELIGION. Given their documented capacity for delusion on so many issues, why would anyone believe them when they insist their religion is true? Religion is the Granddaddy Of Delusions which enables all their other delusions to exist in their heads.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>