This GayTM is Closed

I got a donation request from the Democratic Party.  It gives me a list of issues and asks me to rank my priorities for the party.  Guess what it leaves off that list.

The closest it comes to LGBT issues is “Equal rights for all.”  But that’s so vague it’s meaningless.  The dumbest right-wing, Bachmannite freeper who wants to round up gays and shove us in prison could claim he supports equal rights for all (“But there ain’t no right to sodomy! Or to pervert marriage, neither!”).

The survey goes into further detail on some of these issues.  It asks about things like:

  • Which segments of the economy need the most help
  • Cost of prescription medicine
  • Increasing Pell grants
  • Raising gas mileage standards

You know what they don’t ask about?

  • DOMA
  • DADT
  • Immigration reform for spouses of LGBT Americans
  • Statewide battles for marriage equality.

In fact, they don’t ask any specific questions on “Equal rights for all.”  We’re literally not on their list of priorities.

David Mixner, Americablog.com, and a good many others are refusing to fund the party until the it takes stronger action on LGBT issues.  I’ve been uncertain about that.  After all, Obama inherited a country stuck in two wars and economic crisis.  But you know, he was aware of that when he made promises to our community.  I was infuriatied when the party sent a pre-election mailer out to Maine voters that didn’t mention Prop 1.  And I felt betrayed by the Administration’s silence on the issue.   And I’m tired of endless delays on DADT, despite public support, even among conservatives.

And now this.

What could the Democratic party leadership be thinking?  The most charitable notion is that they’re protecting us:  They fear we wouldn’t do well in a survey, so they’re making us invisible, pushing us back in the closet for our own good.  That strategy, though, would have us living like it’s 1962, when we could quietly go about our lives in silence, fear, and occasional violence, as long as we kept to the shadows.  The key to changing that world was being open about our lives.

It’s not 1962.  We’re not invisible.   And I’m not going back into the closet for anybody.  This GayTM is closed.

Share:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Reddit

3 comments to This GayTM is Closed

  • 1
    Tom L says:

    I could not agree with you more. One of the major issues IMO is the total lack of cognitive leadership when it comes to civil rights for gays. Notice I did not say “gay rights.” This is because I find it moronic to assume the term civil rights applies only to black people.

    Civil and political rights are a class of rights and freedoms that protect individuals from unwarranted government action and ensure one’s ability to participate in the civil and political life of the state without discrimination or repression. Civil rights are often considered to be natural rights. Thomas Jefferson wrote in his 1774 A Summary View of the Rights of British America that “a free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.”

    So where are our voices? Where are those intelligent speakers who are speaking not to ensure their fame but to become famous by virtue of their “actions” as opposed to notoriety?

  • 2

    […] Draft I just sent $100 to President Obama’s campaign fund. Yes, this GayTM has reopened. I guess this means I won’t get yelled at by any more clueless Democratic […]

  • 3

    […] just sent $100 to President Obama’s campaign fund. Yes, this GayTM has reopened. I guess this means I won’t get yelled at by any more clueless Democratic […]

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>