Comments on: “A Separation of Science and State” http://wakingupnow.com/blog/separation-of-science-and-state Wed, 23 May 2012 00:27:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Carvel http://wakingupnow.com/blog/separation-of-science-and-state/comment-page-1#comment-2278 Carvel Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:40:57 +0000 http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=675#comment-2278 He is right. Science changes more than religious DOGMA. Science changes as we learn more facts. Religious DOGMA never changes and never changes even when we learn new facts. As far as most churches know the Sun still revolves aaround the Earth. It took over 400 years to change that fact. Excuse me, scientific theory whereas the church knew it was not a true scientific fact since the beginning of time and the creation of mankind only 6,000 years ago. the Earth is only a little older than that. I will take science anyday because you can change the mind of a scientist with facts, religion knows the facts and you can't change their minds nor do facts matter. The fact that they have been predicting the rapture for two thousand years does not mean they are wrong, just mistaken about the date. Science tells us something will eventually happen to the Earth so they are both right. However, science tells us there are many ways it might happen. The religious people tell us that the only reason it happens is because God will do it, they just don't know how he will do it. This is an argument that we can never win. I don't care what they believe, just stop making it law. He is right. Science changes more than religious DOGMA. Science changes as we learn more facts. Religious DOGMA never changes and never changes even when we learn new facts. As far as most churches know the Sun still revolves aaround the Earth. It took over 400 years to change that fact. Excuse me, scientific theory whereas the church knew it was not a true scientific fact since the beginning of time and the creation of mankind only 6,000 years ago. the Earth is only a little older than that.

I will take science anyday because you can change the mind of a scientist with facts, religion knows the facts and you can’t change their minds nor do facts matter. The fact that they have been predicting the rapture for two thousand years does not mean they are wrong, just mistaken about the date. Science tells us something will eventually happen to the Earth so they are both right. However, science tells us there are many ways it might happen. The religious people tell us that the only reason it happens is because God will do it, they just don’t know how he will do it.

This is an argument that we can never win. I don’t care what they believe, just stop making it law.

]]> By: Mike http://wakingupnow.com/blog/separation-of-science-and-state/comment-page-1#comment-1393 Mike Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:54:09 +0000 http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=675#comment-1393 It get's better! They are calling for a "separation of science and state" amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Amendment - Freedom of Science Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of science, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. http://roadtothemiddleclass.blogspot.com/2009/12/separation-of-science-and-state.html No more CDC, NIH or NSF. And I guess anyone is free to do genetic engineering experiments in their backyard. It get’s better! They are calling for a “separation of science and state” amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Amendment – Freedom of Science

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of science, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

http://roadtothemiddleclass.blogspot.com/2009/12/separation-of-science-and-state.html

No more CDC, NIH or NSF. And I guess anyone is free to do genetic engineering experiments in their backyard.

]]> By: Bernd http://wakingupnow.com/blog/separation-of-science-and-state/comment-page-1#comment-1356 Bernd Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:17:53 +0000 http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=675#comment-1356 Eugenics is a very good example of 'science' that should be kept out of politics. It is 'science' in name only because it is based on beliefs, prejudice, stereotyping, falsified research and political agendas. A current popular example would be the 'science' of Creationism. Eugenics is a very good example of ‘science’ that should be kept out of politics. It is ‘science’ in name only because it is based on beliefs, prejudice, stereotyping, falsified research and political agendas. A current popular example would be the ‘science’ of Creationism.

]]> By: tavdy79 http://wakingupnow.com/blog/separation-of-science-and-state/comment-page-1#comment-1351 tavdy79 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:12:12 +0000 http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=675#comment-1351 http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b278/tavdy79/thestupiditburns.jpg http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b278/tavdy79/thestupiditburns.jpg

]]> By: tavdy79 http://wakingupnow.com/blog/separation-of-science-and-state/comment-page-1#comment-1350 tavdy79 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:11:41 +0000 http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=675#comment-1350 One small correction: sticks and stones generally use newtonian physics as a means of amplifying muscular strength, and the use of stones also implies materials analysis, so pre-science weapons would be human body-parts like fists, feet and teeth. Other than that, this image definitely applies to Rizzuto: One small correction: sticks and stones generally use newtonian physics as a means of amplifying muscular strength, and the use of stones also implies materials analysis, so pre-science weapons would be human body-parts like fists, feet and teeth.

Other than that, this image definitely applies to Rizzuto:

]]>