<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans in Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Box Turtle Bulletin &#187; Really? Ya think?</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-10100</link>
		<dc:creator>Box Turtle Bulletin &#187; Really? Ya think?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-10100</guid>
		<description>[...] even in the gay community.  I don&#8217;t like it.  I expected to like it &#8212; I&#8217;ve been mocking Michele Bachmann for a long time &#8212; but I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even in the gay community.  I don&#8217;t like it.  I expected to like it &#8212; I&#8217;ve been mocking Michele Bachmann for a long time &#8212; but I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Really? Ya think? &#171; wakingupnow.com</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-10099</link>
		<dc:creator>Really? Ya think? &#171; wakingupnow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-10099</guid>
		<description>[...] even in the gay community.  I don&#8217;t like it.  I expected to like it &#8212; I&#8217;ve been mocking Michele Bachmann for a long time &#8212; but I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even in the gay community.  I don&#8217;t like it.  I expected to like it &#8212; I&#8217;ve been mocking Michele Bachmann for a long time &#8212; but I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qmdodnbd</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-7075</link>
		<dc:creator>Qmdodnbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-7075</guid>
		<description>The full council also elects a leader and seven executive councillors. , &lt;a href=&quot;http://pq2.employmentextentuseful.com/marylandunemployment.com.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;marylandunemployment.com&lt;/a&gt;, [url=&quot;http://pq2.employmentextentuseful.com/marylandunemployment.com.html&quot;]marylandunemployment.com[/url], http://pq2.employmentextentuseful.com/marylandunemployment.com.html marylandunemployment.com,  hette,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full council also elects a leader and seven executive councillors. , <a href="http://pq2.employmentextentuseful.com/marylandunemployment.com.html" rel="nofollow">marylandunemployment.com</a>, [url="http://pq2.employmentextentuseful.com/marylandunemployment.com.html"]marylandunemployment.com[/url], <a href="http://pq2.employmentextentuseful.com/marylandunemployment.com.html" rel="nofollow">http://pq2.employmentextentuseful.com/marylandunemployment.com.html</a> marylandunemployment.com,  hette,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which Clown Will Drive the Car? &#171; wakingupnow.com</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-6313</link>
		<dc:creator>Which Clown Will Drive the Car? &#171; wakingupnow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-6313</guid>
		<description>[...] name may be familiar:  he made into my Republicans in Congress video.  He&#8217;s certain global warming is nothing to worry about.  We can ignore all those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] name may be familiar:  he made into my Republicans in Congress video.  He&#8217;s certain global warming is nothing to worry about.  We can ignore all those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crew 16</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-5636</link>
		<dc:creator>Crew 16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-5636</guid>
		<description>The parsing of words by the conservative commentators posted previously is exactly the same game they accuse the originator of this post of playing. On the one hand, by not saying something, it can be inferred that you are saying something. On the other, it is the same thing as a legislator who is allegedly prepared (with significant staff assistance) for making a statement for the Congressional record that sounds like he wouldn&#039;t agree that a husband striking his spouse unprovoked or otherwise would be construed under the law as &quot;domestic violence/assault.&quot;

The cases noted require special attention because it could be that in some parts of these United States, a jury of the accused peers just might find the lynching of a black American and the torture and murder of a gay college student acceptable behavior in their neck of the woods--so to speak. There are parts of this nation that have required Federal intervention to make sure that the law is applied equally to all Americans. And so it is today.

When people do the right thing and play fair, the government is invisible. When people of great power and wealth refuse to acknowledge that they stand on the shoulders of the farmers and shop keeper minutemen who fought for and founded this nation it is the role of the government: local, state and federal to make sure the law is applied equally to all.

It comes down to this: When American individuals decide once and for all that they will abide by the notions of common decency in a civilized society, the government will have no role to play but maintain the parks and keep the peace. However, Americans have proven time and again from generation to generation that individual accountability is for somebody else, not for them. And so we have to legislate to the lowest common denominator, not to the better angels of our nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parsing of words by the conservative commentators posted previously is exactly the same game they accuse the originator of this post of playing. On the one hand, by not saying something, it can be inferred that you are saying something. On the other, it is the same thing as a legislator who is allegedly prepared (with significant staff assistance) for making a statement for the Congressional record that sounds like he wouldn&#8217;t agree that a husband striking his spouse unprovoked or otherwise would be construed under the law as &#8220;domestic violence/assault.&#8221;</p>
<p>The cases noted require special attention because it could be that in some parts of these United States, a jury of the accused peers just might find the lynching of a black American and the torture and murder of a gay college student acceptable behavior in their neck of the woods&#8211;so to speak. There are parts of this nation that have required Federal intervention to make sure that the law is applied equally to all Americans. And so it is today.</p>
<p>When people do the right thing and play fair, the government is invisible. When people of great power and wealth refuse to acknowledge that they stand on the shoulders of the farmers and shop keeper minutemen who fought for and founded this nation it is the role of the government: local, state and federal to make sure the law is applied equally to all.</p>
<p>It comes down to this: When American individuals decide once and for all that they will abide by the notions of common decency in a civilized society, the government will have no role to play but maintain the parks and keep the peace. However, Americans have proven time and again from generation to generation that individual accountability is for somebody else, not for them. And so we have to legislate to the lowest common denominator, not to the better angels of our nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Enderle</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-3885</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Enderle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-3885</guid>
		<description>I see a lot of ad hominem attacks in the comments. They are quick to accuse you if &quot;listening to some leftist organization&#039;, but they have no evidence, or proof. Just bitching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a lot of ad hominem attacks in the comments. They are quick to accuse you if &#8220;listening to some leftist organization&#8217;, but they have no evidence, or proof. Just bitching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robtish</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-2823</link>
		<dc:creator>robtish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 22:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-2823</guid>
		<description>This is the problem I have with conservatives these days.  I have very explicitly explained the foundation for my comment.  Rather than refuting it, you keep offering posts that offer little more than &quot;Nuh uh!&quot;  In your initial post, you say there is no reasoning with me.  I suppose that explains why you have not even attempted to reason with me; you just keep restating your disagreement.  I&#039;ll repeat the logic one more time, and then you&#039;re on your own.

1. Louie said about LGBT hate crime victims in 2007, “There were only 242 crimes where there was actually some — truly an assault.” He’s suggesting, then, that simple assault doesn’t truly count as assault. That’s the only way his number works, as you can see here.
2. The FBI gives us a man slapping his wife as an example of simple assault, the sort of assault Gohmert is suggesting isn’t truly assault.

There you go. It’s an inescapable conclusion of his testimony.

By the way, I&#039;m being quite fair to Gohmert.  He did in fact say that &quot;“There were only 242 crimes where there was actually some — truly an assault.&quot;  This is an untruth, an untruth that he made a special effort to get into the Congressional Record.  He&#039;s either dishonest or incompetent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the problem I have with conservatives these days.  I have very explicitly explained the foundation for my comment.  Rather than refuting it, you keep offering posts that offer little more than &#8220;Nuh uh!&#8221;  In your initial post, you say there is no reasoning with me.  I suppose that explains why you have not even attempted to reason with me; you just keep restating your disagreement.  I&#8217;ll repeat the logic one more time, and then you&#8217;re on your own.</p>
<p>1. Louie said about LGBT hate crime victims in 2007, “There were only 242 crimes where there was actually some — truly an assault.” He’s suggesting, then, that simple assault doesn’t truly count as assault. That’s the only way his number works, as you can see here.<br />
2. The FBI gives us a man slapping his wife as an example of simple assault, the sort of assault Gohmert is suggesting isn’t truly assault.</p>
<p>There you go. It’s an inescapable conclusion of his testimony.</p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;m being quite fair to Gohmert.  He did in fact say that &#8220;“There were only 242 crimes where there was actually some — truly an assault.&#8221;  This is an untruth, an untruth that he made a special effort to get into the Congressional Record.  He&#8217;s either dishonest or incompetent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Calhoon</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Calhoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 22:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>Yes I did read it. Listen more carefully to what the Judge says. Be fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I did read it. Listen more carefully to what the Judge says. Be fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robtish</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>robtish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 14:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>Don, did you read post you&#039;re commenting on?  Let me summarize

1.  Louie said about LGBT hate crime victims in 2007, “There were only 242 crimes where there was actually some — truly an assault.”    He&#039;s suggesting, then, that simple assault doesn&#039;t truly count as assault.  That&#039;s the only way his number works, as you can see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2007/table_07.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
2.  The FBI gives us a man slapping his wife as an example of simple assault, the sort of assault Gohmert is suggesting isn&#039;t truly assault. 

There you go.  It&#039;s an inescapable conclusion of his testimony

Does he believe what he’s suggesting? I hope he’s just an incompetent legislator making a special effort to air false statements that he hasn’t confirmed but believes because they suit his bias and agenda. Yes, that would be giving him the benefit of the doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, did you read post you&#8217;re commenting on?  Let me summarize</p>
<p>1.  Louie said about LGBT hate crime victims in 2007, “There were only 242 crimes where there was actually some — truly an assault.”    He&#8217;s suggesting, then, that simple assault doesn&#8217;t truly count as assault.  That&#8217;s the only way his number works, as you can see <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2007/table_07.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a>.<br />
2.  The FBI gives us a man slapping his wife as an example of simple assault, the sort of assault Gohmert is suggesting isn&#8217;t truly assault. </p>
<p>There you go.  It&#8217;s an inescapable conclusion of his testimony</p>
<p>Does he believe what he’s suggesting? I hope he’s just an incompetent legislator making a special effort to air false statements that he hasn’t confirmed but believes because they suit his bias and agenda. Yes, that would be giving him the benefit of the doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Calhoon</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/rep4that/comment-page-2#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Calhoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 03:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=357#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>I listened to the Gohmert clip 5 times and never heard him say anything about slapping a wife nor did I hear him say anything indicating that he had anything against gays. I heard him say that everyone regardless of who they are, what they believe or who they want to go to bed with has a right to be treated fairly and equally. Also, why the &quot;low-hanging fruit on the crazy tree&quot; comment about Michelle Bachmann? Is it because she is a Christian and practices what she believes and what the Bible teaches? Submission does not mean slavery! In this case it means honor and honor goes both ways. The same passage says for husbands to love their wives as Christ loves the Church (those who believe in Him)and gave himself for it (that is on the cross for our salvation). Submission is also a way of showing love but it doesn&#039;t mean you have to accept the dictates of your husband. It is more like honoring him by considering the way he is leading the family and in return because he loves you he wants what is best for you and the family. I&#039;m sure she and her husband discussed her going to law school and they both agreed. You see, when we love Christ and He lives in us then His will is what we want to do. Here is a secular example: I love my country and I am free to do whatever I want within the parameters of the law. I don&#039;t feel restricted by those laws because I know they are for the good of everyone and I don&#039;t want to break them. So, because I love Christ I am truly free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened to the Gohmert clip 5 times and never heard him say anything about slapping a wife nor did I hear him say anything indicating that he had anything against gays. I heard him say that everyone regardless of who they are, what they believe or who they want to go to bed with has a right to be treated fairly and equally. Also, why the &#8220;low-hanging fruit on the crazy tree&#8221; comment about Michelle Bachmann? Is it because she is a Christian and practices what she believes and what the Bible teaches? Submission does not mean slavery! In this case it means honor and honor goes both ways. The same passage says for husbands to love their wives as Christ loves the Church (those who believe in Him)and gave himself for it (that is on the cross for our salvation). Submission is also a way of showing love but it doesn&#8217;t mean you have to accept the dictates of your husband. It is more like honoring him by considering the way he is leading the family and in return because he loves you he wants what is best for you and the family. I&#8217;m sure she and her husband discussed her going to law school and they both agreed. You see, when we love Christ and He lives in us then His will is what we want to do. Here is a secular example: I love my country and I am free to do whatever I want within the parameters of the law. I don&#8217;t feel restricted by those laws because I know they are for the good of everyone and I don&#8217;t want to break them. So, because I love Christ I am truly free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

