Comments on: Republicans in Congress

By: TheFrankFactor.com

TheFrankFactor.com — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:23:01 +0000

Republicans are social retards and are at least honest about it. Democrats are bald faced liars and shills for corporate power and money. There are differences, real differences, but they exist at the public level more so than Congressional.

By: Meat eating, pussy fucking, gun-toting conservative

Meat eating, pussy fucking, gun-toting conservative — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:30:40 +0000

Pff, give me a break. If you rob/assault/murder a normal person OR a fudgepacker, they are already both equally protected under the law. Take your request for “special rights” and shove that up your ass, if you can do without your boyfriends penis for more than a minute.

By: Lesley Morn

Lesley Morn — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:21:56 +0000

Thanks for putting up this article. I’m unquestionably frustrated with struggling to search out relevant and rational commentary on this matter. Everybody now goes to the very far extremes to either drive home their viewpoint that either: everyone else in the planet is wrong, or two that everyone but them does not really understand the situation. Many thanks for your concise, pertinent insight.

By: “A Separation of Science and State” « wakingupnow.com

“A Separation of Science and State” « wakingupnow.com — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:19:35 +0000

[...] I come back to this theme over and over, but it seems like the Right is offering up another thought experiment to see if it takes hold. An experiment in the politics of sound bites. And do you know how we can be sure that Nick Rizzuto isn’t making a serious argument? Because he never answers a basic question: If we take science out of policy-making, then on what basis do we make policy? [...]

By: CLAllen

CLAllen — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:32:21 +0000

I am in total agreement with your reporting but sadly as a gay man I feel betrayed by the Democrats. I voted for Obama who promised change so far he is continuing business as usual. I would like to see an in depth analysis of the Democratic Party. Unfortunately I feel that both parties of our two party system are out of touch with the will of the people — they seem to be representing the “Wall Street Wizards”. I doubt that there will ever be a viable third party with a serious chance to govern this country. This is the same reason the Original American Revolution was fought God save us all.

By: Miriam

Miriam — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:33:38 +0000

Well put! Thank you!!!

By: deadshot

deadshot — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:06:11 +0000

Great video. I also like the fact you let people post comments without making them register/use a password/identify characters. as some web boards make you do.

I also respect you for letting opponents of the web site and/or comments made post their comments.

Personally, I think the GOP is moving to a far right rump that disagrees with everything the duly elected government of this country is doing purely because they can. The GOP offer no alternatives.

By: Jenn Riedy

Jenn Riedy — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:34:55 +0000

I’d encourage you to do a search on Pub Med using the search term “abortion breast cancer.” You might be surprised by what you find. Here is just one example:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19462841?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&ordinalpos=4

Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 2009 Jan;(340):9-35.

The abortion-breast cancer connection.
Brind J.

Baruch College–City University of New York, NY 10010, USA.

This article examines the abortion breast cancer link in some historical scientific detail, offering a perspective on an issue that is at the center of a long-running public policy debate that plays out in legislatures, courtrooms, and newspaper editorials, as well as in scientific and medical journals. Even as politically correct studies have been promulgated to neutralize the data proving the abortion breast cancer link, even stronger data have emerged in recent years that firmly link abortion to premature births in subsequent pregnancies, which in turn raise the risk of breast cancer in mothers and cerebral palsy in prematurely born children.

(emphasis mine)

By: dean

dean — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:37:19 +0000

I agree with every point. I have only one comment. didn’t you mean Republicrat? That is the same species as Demublican. They’re all the same! Government under Obama looks staretlingly similar to Bush. Tax and spend, spend and tax. Lie, cheat, steal, ignore the oath of office, rob the people and hand it all over to the banksters. What has changed? If you don’t agree, stop drinking the cool-aid. If you do, widen your guns to include the Dmocrats. They’re all liars and thieves.

By: C. Bryan King

C. Bryan King — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:42:39 +0000

I feel I need to clarify my position on the science = religion issue. I only feel that science crosses the line into religion when it stands in opposition to religion, when it refuses to accept that there is any other valid way to arrive at the Truth. So that it really comes down to the attitude of the individual regarding science. If someone believes it is the ONLY valid source of information, then for that person it has become a religion, otherwise it is simply a tool, methodology, practice, or philosophy.