Comments on: “There Are No Homosexuals”

By: Box Turtle Bulletin » The Alliance Defense Fund Lies to its Base

Box Turtle Bulletin » The Alliance Defense Fund Lies to its Base — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:06:36 +0000

[...] and one more delicious bit: Antigays love to say there are no homosexuals, just homosexual behavior. You see that in Brian’s wording: “Harris Interactive [...]

By: More Sinful Homosexual Behavior « wakingupnow.com

More Sinful Homosexual Behavior « wakingupnow.com — Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:11:41 +0000

[...] More Sinful Homosexual Behavior I’m afraid I did it again. I committed more of what the far right calls sinful homosexual behavior. [...]

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:48:40 +0000

They are right. There is indeed only homosexual behaviour. So fucking what? If people want to behave homosexually, let them behave homosexually. Let them behave sexually however they want, so long as all participants are consetning and of age. Jesus.

By: Box Turtle Bulletin » Sinful Homosexual Thanksgiving Behavior (and a recipe!)

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:34:40 +0000

[...] you all know, there are no homosexuals, there is only sinful homosexual behavior. And I’m afraid I’m at it [...]

By: Sinful Homosexual Thanksgiving Behavior (and a recipe!) « wakingupnow.com

Sinful Homosexual Thanksgiving Behavior (and a recipe!) « wakingupnow.com — Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:32:35 +0000

[...] Homosexual Thanksgiving Behavior (and a recipe!) As you all know, there are no homosexuals, there is only sinful homosexual behavior. And I’m afraid I’m at it [...]

By: Choosing Your Actions vs. Choosing Your Orientation « wakingupnow.com

Choosing Your Actions vs. Choosing Your Orientation « wakingupnow.com — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:28:10 +0000

[...] Your Actions vs. Choosing Your Orientation Regular readers know how aggravated I am by the right-wing line that there’s no such thing as homosexuality or a homosexual — there’s just [...]

By: Bill

Bill — Thu, 27 May 2010 21:50:47 +0000

Straight folks should really be better to their LGTB children. Or figure out a way to stop creating so many of us.

Seriously, whether gay children are created by NATURE or NURTURE, both nature AND nurture are the responsibility of heterosexuals. So why make your LGTB children pay for your mistakes, whether those ‘mistakes’ are caused biologically (nature) or are caused by how you raise your children (nurture)?

Heterosexuals have always asserted that gayness is either caused by nature or nurture. But they have never really acknowledged the fact that they are responsible for BOTH of those things.

Kind of unfair not to acknowledge your role in this, no?”

By: Bob

Bob — Wed, 26 May 2010 14:47:10 +0000

Well I guess NARTH’S friend George Rekers is a “heterosexual with a homosexual problem!”

By: Martin

Martin — Wed, 26 May 2010 10:47:53 +0000

What… the earth ISN’T flat???
…
Nonsense. The Australians would all fall off it then…

By: Christopher

Christopher — Mon, 24 May 2010 13:20:09 +0000

@Martin, sorry for getting back late, but I want to clarify that I agree with you completely. I’m just trying to articulate and understand what I think is the FRC’s position in order to argue against it more effectively. And I may be wrong but it seems the more I try to understand it the crazier it seems. Especially since the FRC doesn’t just think protections should be granted on the basis of biology or the Constitution. They also mention characteristics which are “innocuous”. I still have no clue what this refers to, although maybe the FRC thinks that people who, for example, like to read on the bus might be discriminated against. Reading on the bus is a choice, and it’s not protected by the Constitution, but it is innocuous. So if you should ever be discriminated against for reading on the bus you can thank the FRC for standing up for your right to do so. That’s how silly and arbitrary their argument seems to me–they have to reach really far in an attempt to make sure everything but homosexuality or bisexuality is covered. That allows them to claim–falsely–that they’re really against discrimination.

@BradP–thanks for the laugh, although it’s sad that you’re right on the mark. I think I saw that discussion regarding the Earth’s flatness on CNN the other night.