Uganda's Kill-the-Straight-Friends-of-Gays Bill

President Obama’s remarks today have drawn attention back to Uganda’s Kill-the-Gays bill.  And the media still hasn’t gotten it right.  Some conservatives offer the outright lie that it only intends to execute child molesters and people who deliberately spread HIV.  The liberal media points out that the bill would also execute people who merely have gay sex more than once.

But the facts are much worse than that.  I’ve written about this before, but it bears repeating.  Here are two examples of people who could be put to death:

  • Someone who has gay sex once and doesn’t turn his partner in to the authorities.
  • A straight person who doesn’t turn in a gay friend after hearing about about a couple romantic evenings.

You don’t have be gay to be executed under this bill. Here’s how easily the government could put you to death:

  1. The death penalty applies to anyone convicted of “aggravated homosexuality.”
  2. Aggravated homosexuality includes all “serial offenders.”
  3. A serial offender is “a person who has previous convictions of the offence of homosexuality or related offences.”
  4. Related offences (Part III of the bill) include not ratting out your gay friends (if you are a person of religious, political, economic, or social [!] authority).

Here it is as a diagram:

It’s a two-strikes-and-you’re-dead bill.  And if you dig into the logic, merely keeping silent about someone who’s keeping silent is enough to count as a strike.

Read the bill. It’s much worse than we’re being told.  (And feel free to copy and share the pic if you want.)

Share:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Reddit

55 comments to Uganda’s Kill-the-Straight-Friends-of-Gays Bill

  • me

    Looks like Idi Amin is alive and well.

  • Heil Mary

    Uganda will have to execute GOD and ALL MOTHERS because God hasn’t stopped making gay and intersex fetuses and what Ugandan mother can afford in vitro fertilization to teach God a lesson in “natural law”?

  • GAYS ARE NEEDED IN THIS WORLD!

    OTHERWISE RUSH HOUR WILL GET WORST!

    gays can’t reproduce = less people being born = less congestion at rush hour

  • cough

    gay is programming, not DNA(however hard gay groups push towards that propaganda)

  • Hunh?

    Okay, I don’t normally engage in discussion with obvious trolls, but hey, it’s Friday:

    @cough

    Ummm… soooo… straight parents program their kids to be gay?…

    And since this is an article about EXECUTIONS, you’re going to defend arbitrary executions for people who you consider to be “programmed”?

    Well, lets turn the tables; if this were China, and you replaced Gay, with Christian… How would you feel about this article?

  • Huh

    “gay is programming”

    What are you even talking about? Have you even met a gay person before? You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Given your simple and slanted statement, I take it that you are not a scholar in the area of microbiology.

    If you have a more informed opinion of in intricacies of DNA and traits with studies that support your statement, please share in detail. Remember in school, show your math. Otherwise, STFU.

    Just because you think its easy to pick on gays, doesn’t mean you should jack a**.

  • 3.1416wm

    Wow– what a fantastic step forward for civilisation! I’m CERTAIN this will achieve great breakthroughs for us all… Without gays and lesbians– who have been here forever, by the way– we’d have NO ART, NO LITERATURE, NO DANCE,NO MUSIC, and possibly– NO PEOPLE. Gays and lesbians are not aberrations, they are born and occur NATURALLY– and Nature has a purpose for everyone. Hate and bigotry, on the other hand, benefit no one.

    “Cough”– you’re a moron.

  • in-for-a-penny

    @cough

    re “gay is programming, not DNA”
    ———————————

    And religious belief isn’t?

  • Thanks for speaking up about this! I highly recommend you contact Micheal Kirumira of the Atheist Association of Uganda. I & other freethinkers are doing what we can to help his group raise awareness *within* Uganda, and outrage.

    Thanks again!

  • Julien

    Thanks for putting a link to the full bill.

    It’s really astounding reading over that text. It reminds me that hate is not a requirement to perform great evil. We all like to think of perpetrators of evil as cold hearted thugs – it makes the notion of it more manageable somehow. Yet this bill really shatters that perception. Here are smart, kind, people – voting to put to death those whose only crime is to love.

  • plan9

    Why not kill the folks that want to kill gay people? Kill the killers, that should get the message across. Case closed.

  • Paul

    Plan9:

    I agree, let’s kill the stupid and ignorant bigots who continue to rant and rave against The Gays only because they hate the gay in themselves.

  • Straight and pro-gay

    Cut all foreign aid to Uganda. Boycott them so far as travel is concerned too.

  • Eirik

    So… In a consensual situation reported to the authorities, both parties are by turns victim and perpetrator.

    Reporting on such a trial is an offense if any details of the trial leading to identification of the victims are included without court order (Part II, 6 (3)).

    One can conceive that reporting on “the arrest of individuals X and Y on (these) charges”, if they go to separate trials, could be considered two separate offenses (two victims).

  • [...] walkingupnow points this out, and offers more analysis. The language of the bill itself is worth reading, and references the evil influence of “uncensored information technologies” as a corrupting factor. THE ANTI HOMOSEXUALITY BILL 2009 (PDF link). [...]

  • skitzo

    If you believe homosexuality is genetic and not a choice then so is pedophilia, necrophilia, etc. Why don’t you support their rights?

  • MIJ

    IF YOU UNDERSTAND GOD,JAH,ALLAH…ETC RITE! WHAT HAPPEN TO LOT’S WIFE? WHAT HAPPEN TO THE PPL THAT CHOSE TO DO THESE ACT’S?
    IN THE GOOD BOOKS THEY EXPLAIN WHY & WHAT HAPPEN TO THOSE WHO CHOSE THAT PATH OF LIFE!

  • tiredofpeoplelikeskitzo

    Skitzo, if you can’t tell the difference between two consenting gay lovers and pedophilia or necrophilia then there truly is no hope for you. I suggest not talking or writing for a while to save yourself more embarrassment.

  • agreeswithcough

    Sexual orientation could be no more than operant conditioning.

    Further more, why the hell is that a problem?

    So I wasn’t born gay, and it would be hard to turn gay or vice versa. So what? Why does that even matter in this conversation? It’s never cool to judge people by their race, sexual orientation, political affiliations, and give one group of people more or less rights strictly because of that aspect of their lives.

  • tiredofpeoplelikeskitzo

    Well MIJ, if that truly is what you believe, then why not let god do the judging? Ever hear of the ten commandments? Thou shalt not kill? Supporting this bill is the equivalent of committing murder. If you can’t be considerate of gay peoples right to live, then at least protect your own soul from being guilty of murder.

  • normie

    The sad part of this is that the whole anti-gay movement in Uganda was invented and promoted by “christian” missionaries mostly from fundamentalist churches in the USA. Sick!!!

  • Tom

    Homophobe = Closeted

  • Tre

    MIJ – you obviously do not understand God.

    Cough -Gay exists in every species on the planet. Gay is not programming. Religion however, is.

    Normie – right on.

  • Derp

    Uganda leads he awakening against the sodomites !

  • Max

    You are a manipulating liar author, the death penalty is only for fecal sexualist rapists (aka “aggravated homosexualists”), there is a list of all sorts of things in the bill relating to homo acts one can be involved with and you only get 5-7 years. I don’t see you writing articles anywhere denouncing how the death penalty is bad for hetero rapists which has existed in most every country for thousands of years and still does in dozens of countries today. Hypocrite.

    The reason people don’t understand why serious laws like those being considered in Uganda need to be different in Africa is because AIDS is killing **millions upon million** of children and adults and threatening the future existence of ENTIRE nations and people groups. AIDS is proven to be tied by large degree to people becoming involved in homo acts, or becoming involved with prostitutes who have been involved in orgies with others who have been involved in homosexual acts (aka fecal sex).

    Men (or women prostitutes or in orgies) who involve themselves in fecal sex (homosexuality), or with prostitutes who do, then bring back AIDS (or dozens upon dozens of other crippling STDS) to their wives, girlfriends and children, DESTROYING THE ENTIRE FUTURE OF SUCH NATION ITSELF.

    By imprisoning people who engage in fecal sex acts one can have a much larger statistical hope to build male and female marriages (the way of nature) which conceive children, (which no homos can create as babies are not born out of the anus through fecal sex acts), and lower the rate of those millions killed by AIDS, which is a direct result of people involved in fecal sex acts whether in orgies, prostitutes or even with some with animals (beastexuals).

    Places like Uganda are on the cutting edge of the future who are trying to protect their people from a genocide inflicted by AIDS. If laws are not created to protect the general public from people who involve themselves in fecal sex (aka homosexuality), then countries like Uganda and all throughout Africa may never exist in decades to come due to massive and growing deaths directly related to people who involve themselves in such acts, and then bring their diseases to others which in turn kills them both in the end. There are too many millions of innocent children and wives dying from the perverted secret fecal sex acts of a few African men, who then share their diseases with prostitutes, who in turn share it with tens of thousands of men who never even involve themselves in fecal sex.

    Homosexuals are a danger to the future of all African society. These fecal sex laws may seem extreme to people in the USA to imprison people for 5-7 years or up to life for some even, but there are different laws that need to be implemented when entire nations are at risk of extinction due to aids brought about by fecal sex and those touched by those involved in fecal sex.

  • Max

    “I agree, let’s kill the stupid and ignorant bigots who continue to rant and rave against The Gays only because they hate the gay in themselves.”

    You prove your own deviant genocidal hypocrisy. It is you who are the danger to mankind itself, and you types will kill everyone you could just for speaking alone against immoralities such as fecal sex.

    The entire basis for homosexuality is based on HATE, hate for the opposite sex, and hate for nature itself, that is why fecalsexualists froth their hate wherever they go because their entire concept of sex IS HATE. You will never accept that fact though, you will continue planning your genocide upon people who merely express their beliefs in even the most basic of natural morality and protection of children and the future of society itself, unlike your filthy vile hypocritical nihilism which only serves the destruction of the world.

  • Antra

    I really don’t understand why we(LGBT) are so prosecuted…People take the twisted words of preachers who quote bible (which is BTW written by humans only and did not fall from heaven)…

  • [...] Uganda’s Kill-the-Straight-Friends-of-Gays Bill « wakingupnow.com [...]

  • [...] walkingupnow points this out, and offers more analysis. The language of the bill itself is worth reading, and references the evil influence of “uncensored information technologies” as a corrupting factor. THE ANTI HOMOSEXUALITY BILL 2009 (PDF link). (via Jake Applebaum) [...]

  • christian brinkerhoff

    this is coming straight from the evangelists in the usa, the false prophets
    who live for profits have infiltrated africa and filled there heads full
    of hate! yup, its as bad as the american south, maybe a bit worse.
    you can thank the charlatans who call themselves christians for this mess,
    THEY WILL KILL ANYTHING WITHOUT A THOUGHT, as long as its not a white fetus!
    imagine no religeon…..,NAW THAT WOULD BE TOO BORING, NO REASON TO KILL EACH OTHER!religeon is at best politics in disguise, at worst its pure
    mental and spiritual slavery.take away the tax exemption for the blood thirsty,superstitious,homophobic,racist, organizations that claim to spread
    the word of god, what ever the hell god is!

  • brat

    Seems like Max is TOTALLY into rimming. He does object far too much.

  • Jordan681

    “the death penalty is only for fecal sexualist rapists”

    Am I reading this correctly? It is actually possible to “rape” fecal matter?

    If two people are having sex and they’re both consenting, can it be called “rape?”

    It just shows you how far up your ass your head is.

    “I don’t see you writing articles anywhere denouncing how the death penalty is bad for hetero rapists which has existed in most every country for thousands of years and still does in dozens of countries today. Hypocrite.”

    Hey “hypocrite,” you need to tell us how two consenting adult men is anything equivalent to a man forcing a woman to have sex with him.

    “The reason people don’t understand why serious laws like those being considered in Uganda need to be different in Africa is because AIDS is killing **millions upon million** of children and adults and threatening the future existence of ENTIRE nations and people groups. ”

    OK. Let me get this straight (or gay, which ever you prefer). I’m to understand that two adult men having sex is killing millions and millions of children.

    ?

    “AIDS is proven to be tied by large degree to people becoming involved in homo acts, or becoming involved with prostitutes who have been involved in orgies with others who have been involved in homosexual acts (aka fecal sex).”

    Actually, AIDS is proven to be transmitted via unprotected sex, period. I’m sorry, but AIDS doesn’t come from gay people. The act of being gay does not automatically fill your balls with HIV+ sperm.

    AIDS is transmitted via unprotected sex, and the best solution you can come up with is to have guys circumcised themselves, continue to have unprotected sex, and kill gays?

    Yeah. That’s REALLY going to stop HIV.

    Oh, and uh, you need to study biology; it is physically impossible to have “fecal sex.” You can’t have sex with shit. That is, unless you’re refering to gay people as shit. That’s just mean, man…

    “Men (or women prostitutes or in orgies) who involve themselves in fecal sex (homosexuality), or with prostitutes who do, then bring back AIDS (or dozens upon dozens of other crippling STDS) to their wives, girlfriends and children, DESTROYING THE ENTIRE FUTURE OF SUCH NATION ITSELF.”

    And where does HIV/AIDS come from? Don’t tell me you actually think that two guys having sex gives birth to the virus?

    And uh, get a brain. If a man is gay, WHY would he have sex with a woman? That is, unless he’s BI-SEXUAL?

    Uh-oh!!!

    I’m sorry, but unless a man is having sex with children, the children are at absolute zero risk of getting HIV from a gay man.

    “By imprisoning people who engage in fecal sex acts one can have a much larger statistical hope to build male and female marriages (the way of nature) which conceive children, (which no homos can create as babies are not born out of the anus through fecal sex acts), and lower the rate of those millions killed by AIDS, which is a direct result of people involved in fecal sex acts whether in orgies, prostitutes or even with some with animals (beastexuals).”

    Hey, did you know that homosexual acts exist in nature? Check out dolphins and bonobos monkeys if you don’t believe me.

    Uh, OK, you’re right, gays can’t make children… HOW is this related to HIV/AIDS transmission?

    “Places like Uganda are on the cutting edge of the future who are trying to protect their people from a genocide inflicted by AIDS. If laws are not created to protect the general public from people who involve themselves in fecal sex (aka homosexuality), then countries like Uganda and all throughout Africa may never exist in decades to come due to massive and growing deaths directly related to people who involve themselves in such acts, and then bring their diseases to others which in turn kills them both in the end.”

    Oh? Gays in Uganda actively attack straight people and pump HIV+ into the people?

    If that is happening, then I agree completely with the laws. My, I didn’t know Ugandan gays were so horrible.

    “There are too many millions of innocent children and wives dying from the perverted secret fecal sex acts of a few African men, who then share their diseases with prostitutes, who in turn share it with tens of thousands of men who never even involve themselves in fecal sex.”

    I’ve yet to see the connection.

    HOW are children and the wives of straight men who don’t have sex with men getting HIV/AIDS from the gay men who only have sex with men?

    Why would a gay man go to a woman prostitute?

    And uh, I’d like to see a video of a man trying to have sex with shit.

    It oughta be hillarious!

    “Homosexuals are a danger to the future of all African society. These fecal sex laws may seem extreme to people in the USA to imprison people for 5-7 years or up to life for some even, but there are different laws that need to be implemented when entire nations are at risk of extinction due to aids brought about by fecal sex and those touched by those involved in fecal sex.”

    HahhhhAAAAAAAhhahahhhhhhaaaaa!!!!

    A wellfrog is really trying to educate the fish in the sea?

    No my friend. We’re much, much smarter than that.

    Get educated. I’m afraid the AIDS virus does not come about from men having sex with men, or “fecal sex” as you so lovingly like to call it.

    I’m afraid your head’s stuck in your bum. Get it out and educate yourself.

  • chewey

    Max, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

  • Jordan681

    Homosexuality is “programmed?”

    I think that’s almost as bad as the theory that suggests that homosexuality comes from DNA.

    IMO, humans are born and grow up to have the prefrences they like out of experience. I don’t think anyone is ever born “gay” or “straight.

    In a way, I think sexuality CAN be programmed. I think humans are inherently bi. But depending on the society you are born to live in, you are pressured into your sexuality to a certain degree. IE, in Judeo-Christian societies, people want you to get married and have sex and reproduce. So they tell you all these horror stories of what will happen to you if you decide to engage in gay sex. (IE, fire and brimstone…) But at the same time, some of us are born to be rebels, and we consciously REJECT this programming. So the straight programming has a reverse effect.

    If you look at a lot of animals, IE dolphins and bonobos monkeys, one can observe that these animals are very sexual creatures, and they just have sex and they don’t give a f***. They’re not bound by man-made pressures to reproduce; they just know when it’s time, and they do it.

    Maybe things like gay or straight exist in humanity since we became sentient thinking creatures? Perhaps if we were just unthinking animals, we’d be like the bonobos monkeys, screwing each other and not giving a rat’s ass. The straight pair, marriage and children paradigm stems from the Judeo-Christian point of view. The “gay” couple, I’m sorry to have to say, is a parody of that. In nature, just what animal goes around pairing itself and limiting themselves to just ONE partner? No! Animals do like on the discovery channel; they screw around and are “unfaithful” all the time. This, “I want to spend my life with you forever and ever, and only you” is a recent phenomenon. This concept of “love” is only recent. People used to be forcefully married for political and economical reasons, not “love.” Love, “marriage for love” and all this BS is all new. Gays weren’t worried about gay marriage until last century. It’s new.

    As for the DNA thing, I think it’s the silliest idea ever. If it were true that being gay comes from DNA, there’d be no gays around; gays can’t reproduce, unless they’re BI, which, again, there it is again, there is a need to be straight at some point in the gay’s life. In-vitrio just didn’t exist back then.

    And, I think another person on here has a point; if being gay came from DNA, then where would that leave other behavioral traits like promiscuity, pedophilia etc.? What about other sexual traits? Wouldn’t there have to be a trait for like, leather, furry, shoes, etc. as well?

    In searching for a “cause” for gayness, aren’t people also essentually looking for a cure?

    I think we need to drop this search for “what makes you gay.” You are who you are and that’s the end of it. Some people are more gay than others, others occasionally like to fool around. It’s sad we can’t be sexually free to do whatever we want. I think inventing labels like “gay” and “straight” only helps solidify us into this us-and-them paradigm. If there weren’t these labels, I think we’d find that people that call themselves “straight” today aren’t as “straight” as they lead on to believe; they’re just acting because no-one wants to be labeled a fag.

    And, it IS irrelevant:

    Gay or straight, or bi, HIV spreads, and the only way to fight it off is protection.

    It is quite stupid and ignorant, if not mean and cruel, that officials in Uganda actually think killing off gays and their friends is going to do anything to reduce the spread of HIV.

    I think as long as they take this attitude, no self-respecting 1st world country should give them a single penny more to help them out.

  • Well boys, it looks like these negros have figured out how to stop sick behavior.

  • To Julien — “Here are smart, kind, people”? Nonsense. They’re thugs — nothing but. Sorry, but when you’re talking about killing people for completely innocuous conduct — you’re not “smart, kind people”.

  • jimbojamesIV

    I propose this for a solution: America should not have any contact with Uganda, which is actually probably a good thing for Uganda, but nevertheless, no American may have any contact with Uganda and vice versa, and, oh yeah, for those Clarence Thomas types, that means no corporations either. That is how America should operate. The same goes for China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and probably several other nations (Russia?).

  • Zach

    I never understood why homosexuality was (and is) considered to be an attack on “traditional marriage”… (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-id4GKsaQk&feature=related) <– relevant! (skip to 1:35).

  • Why is it WORSE that the Ugandan government has decided to also kill “innocent” bystanders — ie straight or mostly straight people? Isn’t it bad enough, and noteworthy enough, and indicative of evil enough, that they want to kill gay people in the first place, let alone those who assist gay people in being gay, or at least avoiding death? Either policy — killing gay people or killing gay people and their straight buddies — is equally evil, so why the noise about the big difference?

    On a side note, why does everyone say “straight people” and “gays”? In the name of consistency, wouldn’t it make more sense to say “straights” and “gays,” or even “straight people” and “gay people.” The semantics are indicative of a culture that perceives straight as the norm and the default — they get the appendage “straight” while gay people are merely “gays,” sort of like “sows.”

    [Webmaster's note: Sarah, to me it's worse for three reasons. First, because the law sentences more people to death than we originally thought. That's enough to make it worse, and it doesn't matter whether those people are straight or gay. Second, as I pointed out in a prior post, with the "serial offender" clause and the failure-to-report clause, it's not necessary to have gay sex more than once to be put to death -- if you do it just once and don't turn your partner in to the authorities, you can be put to death. So it's easier for a gay person to be subject to the death penalty than we thought. Finally, it's worse because (imaging myself as a Ugandan citizen) the more loyal my friends are to me, the higher the penalty they might ultimately pay. All those things, to me, make the bill much worse than is being widely reported.]

  • Darn butterfingers — the last sentence should say “straight PEOPLE,” not “straight.” Also there should be another question mark in there somewhere.

  • Garrick

    Is there anything in the bill about punishing false accusations? This bill is is a great tool for revenge, say if you want to get even with the fellow who stole your girl.

  • RINSAC

    Poor Uganda!!!!!! Will it ever be free of idiots like this?

  • X

    Max, you really need to get laid.

    Just douche better next time, and your sex won’t be fecal at all.

  • Diva2you

    “The trouble with Africa is that it’s filled with black people!” south park

  • sad

    Interesting argument about HIV, I think the country would have more success at controlling the number of infections by becoming a protestant country than murdering homosexuals.

    Stop preaching hatred and wear a condom.

  • [...] "Uganda's Kill-the-Straight-Friends-of-Gays Bill#," is from Waking Up Now (2/5/10). "Right Place, Right Time#," is by Paul Burka from The Texas Monthly (2/1/10). Jon's comment: "Rick Perry for pres. 2012? What a nightmare!" [...]

  • Diva2you

    Wow imagine God hates blacks more than fags! News at 11!!

  • Freeloader

    Hey Jordan. Geese stick to one couple for lifetime. And that’s only one example, as that behavior can be seen in other avian species. Also, the concept of “love” may have already been screwed with in every possible way, but the concepts of “affection”, “loyalty” and “emotional bonding” are in fact present in nature, so we could say love is natural. I mean, just look at female mammals nurturing children of another species: that’s love. Look at dogs that mourn the death of their human companion: that’s love. Look at all animals that can coexist amicably without going into parasitic relationships: that’s love.

    Also: I agree with you in that we should stop looking for “the origin of homosexuality”, yes. I, however, don’t agree that we make a choice. I mean, as far as I know, you could ask any man out there if he has a choice and control about what makes his sexual organ flooded with blood and they’ll pretty much say no. I would.

    Sarah: I’d go all the way and eliminate the labels entirely. I mean, it’s not like a dolphin would care if the dude swimming next to him has had sex with other males, so why should humankind, who are also an intelligent specie, care?

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>