<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irony in Virginia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wakingupnow.com/blog/irony-in-virginia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/irony-in-virginia</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Norman</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/irony-in-virginia/comment-page-1#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=1419#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>Yes and this is the same governor who gave the response to President Obama&#039;s first state of the union address. While using his son&#039;s to create humor in that speech, I was not impressed in the least. And I am not surprised by anything this governor has to say or do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and this is the same governor who gave the response to President Obama&#8217;s first state of the union address. While using his son&#8217;s to create humor in that speech, I was not impressed in the least. And I am not surprised by anything this governor has to say or do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradP</title>
		<link>http://wakingupnow.com/blog/irony-in-virginia/comment-page-1#comment-2123</link>
		<dc:creator>BradP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingupnow.com/blog/?p=1419#comment-2123</guid>
		<description>But the thing that really puzzles me is that the directive, nonbinding as it is, makes the point that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a violation of the Federal Equal Protection clause of the Constitution.  That&#039;s a pretty astonishing statement by, of all things, a Republican.  If he is making that point, he &lt;i&gt;necessarily&lt;/i&gt; has to concede that a) gays are a protected class and b) same sex marriage is constitutionally-mandated.  Either he&#039;s shooting his mouth off trying to score niceness points without thinking the consequences of his statements through all the way, or he secretly love the gays.  I&#039;m guessing it&#039;s the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the thing that really puzzles me is that the directive, nonbinding as it is, makes the point that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a violation of the Federal Equal Protection clause of the Constitution.  That&#8217;s a pretty astonishing statement by, of all things, a Republican.  If he is making that point, he <i>necessarily</i> has to concede that a) gays are a protected class and b) same sex marriage is constitutionally-mandated.  Either he&#8217;s shooting his mouth off trying to score niceness points without thinking the consequences of his statements through all the way, or he secretly love the gays.  I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

